The Apricity Forum: a European cultural community>In general>Genetic> What race are the Dravidians closest to Caucasians, Mongoloids, Australoids?
PDA
Show full version:What race are the Dravidians closest to Caucasians, Mongoloids, Australoids?
Butler King
16/09/2014, 20:42
I previously made a thread about whether Dravidians are Caucasian or Australoid, but I know I'm having second thoughts.
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?71885-Dravidians-Caucasoid-or-Australoids
My mistake: I used to think that anthropology was more important than genetics, but now I realize that genetics is 100 times more important. Morphological traits can always change in different environments, but genetic traits always remain the same.
Dravidians in London. Their appearance is neither Caucasian nor Negroid, they are what Dravidians are. However, they share similar features with Caucasians in body structure, but skin color with Negroids, but genetically with Mongoloids.
http://tamilguardian.com/files/Image/pictures/diaspora/Uni%20Tamil%20Soc%20Nov%202011/340438_226341737430725_124424337622466_671368_9606 48443_o.jpg
The idea that they are Mongoloids is preposterous, but if the Ainu consider themselves Mongoloids, why not the Dravidians?
According to Bamshad et al. (2002): To test whether samples from India could be distinguished in an analysis of samples from three continents, we added samples from Africa and reanalyzed the data. This time the best estimate was K 3 , and the assignment to the correct population was >98% for samples from sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia and Europe, samples from South India were predominantly (84%) assigned to the East Asia group, but some (16%) were assigned to the group associated with Europeans. According to Watkins et al.
In another 2009 study conducted among 10 Asian countries, the Dravidian peoples showed similarities with North Indians, as well as with people from Malaysia, Singapore, and China.[19] "
Cerro
16/09/2014, 20:50
They are australoid, but not purebred. There are Caucasians, albeit very far from true Caucasians, and some Southeast Asians.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:04
They are australoid, but not purebred. There are Caucasians, albeit very far from true Caucasians, and some Southeast Asians.
But genetics say they are 84% East Asian.
Are Australoids East Asians?
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:12
They are australoid, but not purebred. There are Caucasians, albeit very far from true Caucasians, and some Southeast Asians.
READ THIS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22406710
Indio J Dent Res. 2011 set-out;22(5):664-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93453.
A comparison of lip prints between Aryan-Dravidian and Mongolian.
Prasad P1; irse
"Native Americans are closer to Mongoloids than Caucasoids or Negroids, as the family tree shows. Most studies on lip prints have been done on their own population. They are close to the Mongolian race and are genetically similar."
Cerro
16/09/2014, 21:13
But genetics say they are 84% East Asian.
Are Australoids East Asians?
East Asia in the broadest sense
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:16
East Asia in the broadest sense
What I don't understand is why they claim to be the closest thing to their mongoloid race.
Did an Indian scientist say that they showed more genetic resemblance to the Mongolian race? crazy and stupid
The world should be destroyed because everyone is making crazy claims.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:21
Surprisingly, Wikipedia mentioned that they were East Asian whenever it was made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_peoples
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:25
More on Dravidians... and getting weirder...
"Due to the admixture between Australoid, Caucasian and Mongoloid racial groups, one cannot speak of a biologically separate 'Dravidian race' distinct from non-Dravidians on the Indian subcontinent. Several Amerindian groups have been analysed, providing strong evidence to suggest that modern Indians (Indo-Aryan and Dravidian groups) are a hybrid population descended from two genetically divergent post-Neolithic populations termed "Native North Americans" and "Native South Americans". of the ANI-ASI gene on the continent.[22]"
Green cabbage
16/09/2014, 21:26
The indigenous peoples of South Asia are close to the root of Caucasians and Mongols, so to speak. Since the divergence, there have been Caucasian and Mongolian migrations into South Asia, so it really depends on which part you are in to determine which is more dominant.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:28
The indigenous peoples of South Asia are close to the root of Caucasians and Mongols, so to speak. Since the divergence, there have been Caucasian and Mongolian migrations into South Asia, so it really depends on which part you are in to determine which is more dominant.
Dravidians look like 0% Mongoloids, specifically Northwest Indians look like 0.00000000000000% Mongoloids.
However, I don't understand how scientists claim they are 84% East Asian and closer to Mongoloids but still have 0% physical ties to them.
I once heard a theory that South Asians have a similar black hair texture to Mongoloids.
I wish there was a video that explained this crap once and for all.
Steirisches Mujo
16/09/2014, 21:29
I've heard some say that South Asians are like pre-Eurasians who didn't evolve like Europeans and Asians for a few reasons.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:33
I've heard some say that South Asians are like pre-Eurasians who didn't evolve like Europeans and Asians for a few reasons.
I used to think they were Proto-Caucasian, but Proto-Caucasians have Caucasian DNA while Proto-Dravidians have East Asian DNA.
Something doesn't make sense.
An albino looks more like a Caucasian, but anthropologists have always denied that he is a Caucasian people.
http://www.noopooh.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/indian8.png
Green cabbage
16/09/2014, 21:35
Dravidians look like 0% Mongoloids, specifically Northwest Indians look like 0.00000000000000% Mongoloids.
However, I don't understand how scientists claim they are 84% East Asian and closer to Mongoloids but still have 0% physical ties to them.
I once heard a theory that South Asians have a similar black hair texture to Mongoloids.
I wish there was a video that explained this crap once and for all.
Simply...
The first non-Africans separate from the Africans.
Thus, the Basaleurasians split from the Eurasians.
Then Eurasians were divided into Western and Eastern Eurasians (somewhere in India).
Then you have the ancestors of whites, Mongols and Indians in India. Mongols move east, and Mongols for a while. Whites move westward and some populations absorb basaltic mixing from Eurasia. Therefore, if we consider indigenous Amerindians based on Africans, Mongols or Caucasians, they will generally align with Mongols because Mongols would be the most direct descendants.
However, this would essentially only apply to the darkest of the dark, as there has been a back flow of Caucasians to India for the most part.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:41
Simply...
The first non-Africans separate from the Africans.
Thus, the Basaleurasians split from the Eurasians.
Then Eurasians were divided into Western and Eastern Eurasians (somewhere in India).
Then you have the ancestors of whites, Mongols and Indians in India. Mongols move east, and Mongols for a while. Whites move westward and some populations absorb basaltic mixing from Eurasia. Therefore, if we consider indigenous Amerindians based on Africans, Mongols or Caucasians, they will generally align with Mongols because Mongols would be the most direct descendants.
However, this would essentially only apply to the darkest of the dark, as there has been a back flow of Caucasians to India for the most part.
I still don't understand this shit. :picard2:
I understand the division of Eurasia 41,000 years ago and such.
How would you define the Dravidian race?
What is the most important definition of race for you? Genetics or physical appearance?
Dravidians who are 84% East Asian and 16% European/Caucasian but see themselves as dark-skinned Caucasians or hairy-bodied/straight-haired Australoids
Who are the closest cousins of the Dravidians?
Green cabbage
16/09/2014, 21:48
I still don't understand this shit. :picard2:
I understand the division of Eurasia 41,000 years ago and such.
How would you define the Dravidian race?
What is the most important definition of race for you? Genetics or physical appearance?
Dravidians who are 84% East Asian and 16% European/Caucasian but see themselves as dark-skinned Caucasians or hairy-bodied/straight-haired Australoids
Who are the closest cousins of the Dravidians?
They are not 84% East Asian. South Asians are essentially divergent enough to form their own group.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:49
They are not 84% East Asian. South Asians are essentially divergent enough to form their own group.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_peoples
"More recently, other geneticists such as Lynn B. Jorde and Stephen P. Wooding have shown that South American Indians were more closely related to East Asians.[15][16][17]
Why don't you say south Asia?
Butler King
16/09/2014, 21:59
They are not 84% East Asian. South Asians are essentially divergent enough to form their own group.
It's not just European scientists who make these claims.
I once emailed a South Indian professor who is a close friend of a North Indian scientist, Delhi, and replied that "South Indians have the closest genetic affinity and relationship with Indians. " Mongoloids of Southeast Asia".
I bet if you told this to an Indian they would say "WHAT THE FUCK???!!!"
Butler King
16/09/2014, 22:02
And I thought being East Asian is like Korean, Chinese, Manchu, Tibetan. Japanese, Taiwanese, Mongolian, Hong Kong, etc.
Still, they claimed their proximity to Southeast Asia as Malaysians, Singaporeans
peterselva2
16/09/2014, 22:09
How do native Australoids relate to Dravidians?
Dravidians are simply Native Americans who speak the Dravidian language with a darker than average Indian skin tone.
Native Americans are basically their own race.
Butler who is INDIAN needs to know :)
peterselva2
16/09/2014, 22:11
I've heard some say that South Asians are like pre-Eurasians who didn't evolve like Europeans and Asians for a few reasons.
What the hell do you mean by DEVELOP exactly?
Butler King
16/09/2014, 22:15
How do native Australoids relate to Dravidians?
Dravidians are simply Native Americans who speak the Dravidian language with a darker than average Indian skin tone.
Butler who is INDIAN needs to know :)
Dravidians are Native Americans, but they are not genetically the same. Northern Indians are 3 times closer to Western Eurasia and Southern Indians are 3 times closer to Eastern Eurasia.
Being Australian Aboriginal does not mean being Australian. Get your facts first, they don't have much to do with the Negroid looking Australoid. Dravidians are more like Veddoid, who are of a different type. Australoids come in many different types. Veddas/Southern Indians are considered by some to be Australoids, although this is not necessarily the case, they are not found anywhere except in South Asia.
http://vedda.org/pix/dambana_veddas_2000.jpg
Anyway, I still don't get it.
Steirisches Mujo
16/09/2014, 22:15
What the hell do you mean by DEVELOP exactly?
Different human populations develop different traits for obvious reasons. I think the correct term is microevolution or something like that.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 22:31
Another explanation?
a blog
16/09/2014, 22:33
http://img.es/7ando.jpg
Butler King
16/09/2014, 22:34
http://img.es/7ando.jpg
What does this genetic diagram say?
I don't understand.
a blog
16/09/2014, 22:52
What does this genetic diagram say?
I don't understand.
This is the racial map, the origin of races based on the genetic map. (http://www.humpopgenfudan.cn/p/A/A1.pdf) This was the tale.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 22:53
This is the racial map, the origin of races based on the genetic map. (http://www.humpopgenfudan.cn/p/A/A1.pdf) This was the tale.
I don't understand.
But that's how it is
To the Dravidian Race
Genetic views of the race differ in their classification of Dravidians. According to Stanford population geneticist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, based on work from the 1980s, Indians are genetically Caucasian, but Lewontin rejects the Caucasian label. Cavalli-Sforza found that Indians are about three times closer to Western Europeans than to East Asians.[7] dr. Eduardas Valaitis found in 2006 that India is genetically closer to East and Southeast Asians, with about 15% more genetic similarity than Europeans; he also noted that India can be considered very different from other regions.[8] In the 1960s, genetic anthropologist Stanley Marion Garn saw the entire Indian subcontinent as a "race" genetically distinct from other populations. Others, such as Lynn B. Jorde and Stephen P. Wooding, argue that South Indians are genetic mediators between Europeans and East Asians.[10][11][12]
a blog
16/09/2014, 22:54
I don't understand.
But that's how it is
[B]A Dravidian race
Dravidian is a language and not a race. The [Veddo-]Australoid is the race.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 23:15
Dravidian is a language and not a race. The [Veddo-]Australoid is the race.
Yes Yes Yes. I know Dravidian is a language.
Although their typical appearance (more than 95% are like this)
easily distinguishable
http://static4.demotix.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/a_scale_large/2100-7/photos/1372128132-uk-tamils-protest-against-sri-lanka-hosting-chogm_2190457.jpg
flaccid
16/09/2014, 23:18
The 100% pure Dravidians are definitely closer to the Australoids than any other population. The average modern is probably a mixture of Caucasoid/Australoid with some very small Mongoloid.
Butler King
16/09/2014, 23:22
The 100% pure Dravidians are definitely closer to the Australoids than any other population. The average modern is probably a mixture of Caucasoid/Australoid with some very small Mongoloid.
I have never considered the mix of Dravidians with Mongoloids as (true) Mongoloid DNA is 0% even in South India.
Despite all this, they are still the most similar to the Mongolian race in almost every DNA diagram I've seen. So all this is confusion.
My only explanation that Australoids are Mongoloids by DNA and genetics but not by anthropology.
Green cabbage
17/09/2014, 02:33
I have never considered the mix of Dravidians with Mongoloids as (true) Mongoloid DNA is 0% even in South India.
Despite all this, they are still the most similar to the Mongolian race in almost every DNA diagram I've seen. So all this is confusion.
My only explanation that Australoids are Mongoloids by DNA and genetics but not by anthropology.
Upside down... The Mongoloids are part Australoid (by which I mean derived from the indigenous peoples of southern India).
Butler King
17/09/2014, 03:16
Upside down... The Mongoloids are part Australoid (by which I mean derived from the indigenous peoples of southern India).
perhaps yes
Are mongoloids cold-adapted australoids?
Sméagol
17/09/2014, 03:31
perhaps yes
Are mongoloids cold-adapted australoids?
No, they are a completely different race today, but their distant ancestors were part Australoids. "Australoid" (basically weddoid) territory has extended much further into the past. Northeast Asians have been Mongolian since prehistoric times, while Southeast Asians were mostly Mongolized by waves of Mongoloids from southern China in historic times. However, some Southeast Asians still have Autraloid/Weddoid traits.
Butler King
17/09/2014 03:42 a. m.
No, they are a completely different race today, but their distant ancestors were part Australoids. "Australoid" (basically weddoid) territory has extended much further into the past. Northeast Asians have been Mongolian since prehistoric times, while Southeast Asians were mostly Mongolized by waves of Mongoloids from southern China in historic times. However, some Southeast Asians still have Autraloid/Weddoid traits.
They are completely different races physically but not genetically. That's why I said that genetics is more important than anthropology.
How did the Mongoloid come about?
Mongoloid features existed about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago.
Sméagol
17/09/2014, 03:45
They are completely different races physically but not genetically. That's why I said that genetics is more important than anthropology.
How did the Mongoloid come about?
Mongoloid features existed about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago.
Sméagol
17/09/2014, 03:48
They are completely different races physically but not genetically. That's why I said that genetics is more important than anthropology.
How did the Mongoloid come about?
Mongoloid features existed about 12,000 to 15,000 years ago.
Genetically they probably have a lot of an East Eurasian mix, but most Dravidians are closer to the Caucasus (which is a physical racial type, not talking about genetics or anything else).
Butler King
17/09/2014 03:49 a. m.
Genetically they probably have a lot of an East Eurasian mix, but most Dravidians are closer to the Caucasus (which is a physical racial type, not talking about genetics or anything else).
Oh... no way. They are not closer to the Caucasus because if they were closer to the Caucasus they would have a Caucasus skull, which they don't.
Sméagol
17/09/2014, 03:50
Oh... no way. They are not closer to the Caucasus because if they were closer to the Caucasus they would have a Caucasus skull, which they don't.
Most are Caucasian and Australian mixes. Just look at typical Tamils.
Butler King
17/09/2014 03:56 a. m.
Most are Caucasian and Australian mixes. Just look at typical Tamils.
Typical Tamils do not have a Caucasian skull.
These are veddoid characteristics.
Caucasian admixture (or rather West Eurasian admixture) makes up only 14% among South Indians.
Australoids are closer to Mongoloids on the genetic map than to Caucasoids or Negroids.
Greif
22/09/2014, 04:25
The Paleolithic ancestors of Neolithic Dravidian speakers sounded the same as the Australian Abos (true Australoids). As these Australoids lived as far away as Pakistan at the dawn of civilization, after the advent of agriculture they began to incorporate Caucasian phenotypes through Middle Eastern influence.
The influence of the western steppes and the Middle East lasted for thousands of years, introducing J and R to the dark brown population.
The ancient Dravidian Veddoids were an intermediate species between the Archean Australoids and the Mongloids, with a slight phenotypic influence from the Caucasus of the Middle East and Central Asia.
Mortimer
22/09/2014, 04:54
Blacks are genetically close to Southeast Asians. But they seem worlds apart, &c. I'm not as familiar with Dravidian genetics, but I think they're West Eurasians on the world map, but farther than North Indians and North Indians farther from Europe than Middle Eastern ones. I also don't know how important the ancient components are to the race when they have been stabilized for thousands of years, this is different from biracial, in fact Europeans are also mixed races from Sardinia, Siberia and Western Europe etc, but really only Europeans. It depends on how you define it and how long you look at it, we even have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA, etc., just traces, but it's still evolution and many components overlap. In my opinion, Indians are Asian (or South Asian). I wouldn't go into technical details about genetic studies, ancient hominids, etc. or anthropological races as much as I would look at it from a social perspective. In America or Britain, Indians and Pakistanis are "Asians" or simply "Native Americans", "Pakistanis", etc. whatever they are, they have been a distinct culture for thousands of years. in my opinion you can't call them Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Australoid etc because you would miss the fact that they are Indian. the indian genomic institution divides the subcontinent into 4 morphological types "caucasian, mongoloid, australoid and black" and i think dravidians can be australoid or caucasian. Also, not all Dravidians are exactly the same, I mean people who speak a Dravidian language. My two cents, do you agree?
Gustavo H.
22/09/2014, 04:57
I met one of these people and she identified herself as "Asian". I would say they have East Asia in them as well as a few other things. They are definitely mixed up.
Sikeliot
22/09/2014, 05:02
They are intermediate between Caucasians and Australoids and are therefore partially related to people like Papuans, Australian Aboriginals, etc.
Mortimer
22/09/2014, 05:07
Caucasoid is also not a valid breed for me. others may disagree, but the differences are too great, I also don't believe in subraces defined by skull measurements like Alpinids, Nordics, etc. or any relationship based on them. I think a Pontid and an East Norse Russian are much closer than a Northern English and a Nordic Russian etc. You cannot set nationalities etc. by race. ok obviously there are whites and blacks and asians etc but I don't think there is much Caucasian difference in phenotype and culture that a Swede and a Palestinian have nothing in common. Europe is a geographic region that is culturally and phenotypically similar, with a few minor exceptions out of the mix (such as Sicily or the Canary Islands, which might seem exotic, etc.), but other than that I don't see any connection between the Caucasian races. , etc., where my opinion is not valid. I don't know what the first people in India were like, but also in Europe the first people looked different from now, for example, everyone had brown eyes and fair skin, first in the Middle East, etc. I would not do. get into it a lot. Some Indians look a little like Australian Aborigines, it's true. there are also adamnese islanders who look like little pygmies and there are also north east indians who look like tibetans etc. it's diverse. I think most Native Americans are smart and have a North and South Caucasian sage, if you think that's valid. but culturally and racially they are Indians, a world of their own. I would never confuse a super-Caucasian Indian with a European, or a super-Caucasian Iraqi with a European, so I think Caucasian should only apply to Europeans, if at all. which is so popular in the United States.
Mortimer
22/09/2014, 05:08
They are intermediate between Caucasians and Australoids and are therefore partially related to people like Papuans, Australian Aboriginals, etc.
they are not genetic. just for looks. genetically different from papuan and australian aborigines, they can be up to 1% of oceanic or more, not more.
Butler King
22/09/2014, 06:13
Blacks are genetically close to Southeast Asians. But they seem worlds apart, &c. I'm not as familiar with Dravidian genetics, but I think they're West Eurasians on the world map, but farther than North Indians and North Indians farther from Europe than Middle Eastern ones. I also don't know how important the ancient components are to the race when they have been stabilized for thousands of years, this is different from biracial, in fact Europeans are also mixed races from Sardinia, Siberia and Western Europe etc, but really only Europeans. It depends on how you define it and how long you look at it, we even have Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA, etc., just traces, but it's still evolution and many components overlap. In my opinion, Indians are Asian (or South Asian). I wouldn't go into technical details about genetic studies, ancient hominids, etc. or anthropological races as much as I would look at it from a social perspective. In America or Britain, Indians and Pakistanis are "Asians" or simply "Native Americans", "Pakistanis", etc. whatever they are, they have been a distinct culture for thousands of years. in my opinion you can't call them Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Australoid etc because you would miss the fact that they are Indian. the indian genomic institution divides the subcontinent into 4 morphological types "caucasian, mongoloid, australoid and black" and i think dravidians can be australoid or caucasian. Also, not all Dravidians are exactly the same, I mean people who speak a Dravidian language. My two cents, do you agree?
Yes, the Negritos are genetically close to the Southeast Asians, but it seems that the Dravidians are even closer, I personally don't understand.
I seriously doubt the Dravidians are West Eurasian, I mean all they have is nothing more than 14-16% West Eurasian and 84-86% South Asian.
I am not saying that the Dravidians are like a subgroup of the Mongolian race, just that they are genetically closer to the East Asian Mongoloids than to the West Eurasians; on the other hand, North Indians are 3 times closer to West Eurasians. But southern India is closer to Mongoloid.
Butler King
22/09/2014, 06:14
They are intermediate between Caucasians and Australoids and are therefore partially related to people like Papuans, Australian Aboriginals, etc.
All they have is a 14-16% Western Eurasian mix and also their Australoid phenotypes don't look like black looking Australoids but rather Sri Lankan Veddas. Their phenotypes are Weddoids or Veddoids.
Green cabbage
22/09/2014, 17:11
All they have is a 14-16% Western Eurasian mix and also their Australoid phenotypes don't look like black looking Australoids but rather Sri Lankan Veddas. Their phenotypes are Weddoids or Veddoids.
Okay, let's try a visual format...
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=50864
Butler King
23/09/2014, 06:39
Okay, let's try a visual format...
http://www.theapricity.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=50864
I don't know where you got that stupid picture from. It looks drawn and bad.
It certainly doesn't make sense and doesn't fit with all the other genetic studies that show that Dravidians are much closer to Mongoloids.
Green cabbage
23/09/2014, 17:52
I don't know where you got that stupid picture from. It looks drawn and bad.
It certainly doesn't make sense and doesn't fit with all the other genetic studies that show that Dravidians are much closer to Mongoloids.
It looks drawn because it's drawn, I just drew it. It makes perfect sense in all genetic studies (with some fine-tuning).
Butler King
24/09/2014 01:59 a. m.
It looks drawn because it's drawn, I just drew it. It makes perfect sense in all genetic studies (with some fine-tuning).
hahaha with all the genetic studies????
Look how many quotes I've made about South Indians being closer to East Asia or Mongoloids. and see how many quotes you made about being close to Caucasian/Western Eurasian (it's like 0)
Mortimer
24/09/2014, 02:24
hahaha with all the genetic studies????
Look how many quotes I've made about South Indians being closer to East Asia or Mongoloids. and see how many quotes you made about being close to Caucasian/Western Eurasian (it's like 0)
people are ignorant There are thousands of sciences of the past (raccoon, deniker anthropology, etc.) which claims that gypsies would pass through Australia before India, etc. or would call gypsies a weddoid, &c.
Butler King
24/09/2014, 02:27
people are ignorant There are thousands of sciences of the past (raccoon, deniker anthropology, etc.) which claims that gypsies would pass through Australia before India, etc. or would call gypsies a weddoid, &c.
Gypsies don't look like Indians......
Roma are 40% NW Indian + 30% European + 30% Middle Eastern.
This makes him very Caucasian, more so than anyone in South Asia.
Mortimer
24/09/2014, 02:41
Gypsies don't look like Indians......
Roma are 40% NW Indian + 30% European + 30% Middle Eastern.
This makes him very Caucasian, more so than anyone in South Asia.
For some reason Native Americans seem to be dominant and they are 47% of NW India (recent genome study using Meghawal as a proxy) but it's diverse, many Gypsies don't look like Native Americans but many can get by without a problem.
Green cabbage
24/09/2014 3:33 a. m.
hahaha with all the genetic studies????
Look how many quotes I've made about South Indians being closer to East Asia or Mongoloids. and see how many quotes you made about being close to Caucasian/Western Eurasian (it's like 0)
You have repeatedly cited the same misinterpreted stupidity, and nothing more.
Butler King
24/09/2014, 04:59
You have repeatedly cited the same misinterpreted stupidity, and nothing more.
misunderstood? these are interpreted by scientists from South Asia and Europe.
You have nothing to check other than home charts.
Green cabbage
24/09/2014, 18:03
misunderstood? these are interpreted by scientists from South Asia and Europe.
You have nothing to check other than home charts.
No, your misinterpretation of their interpretations. Tell me, what samples were involved in this so-called study that "proved" that Indians were "86% Asian"?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2023 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
FAQs
Which races are Dravidian in India? ›
Ethnic groups. The largest Dravidian ethnic groups are the Telugus from Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, the Tamils from Tamil Nadu, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Singapore, the Kannadigas from Karnataka, the Malayalis from Kerala, and the Tulu people from Karnataka.
Where did Australoid race come from? ›Australoid race was a word for the aboriginal people of Australia, Melanesia, and parts of Southeast Asia. In former times, many people divided human beings into four races. These races were called Australoid, Mongoloid, Caucasoid, and Negroid. Today, scientists agree that there is only one human race.
Who are Australoid people in India? ›The Australoids entered India from South East Asia. They had dark skin tone with a broad head, flat nose, and short height. Tribes like Kol, Munda, Khasi, tribes of Nicobar and Myanmar have similar origins to the Australoids. The Aryans called them 'Nishad'.
Are Australoids Negroes? ›Although Aus- traloids and Negroids are closely related, authorities seem to be confident in distinguish- ing these two races among living populations.
Are Dravidian people African? ›The Dravidian and Siddi people came from Africa (Winters, 2007a, 2008a,2008b,2010). The Dravidians belonged to the C-group people (Winters, 2007, 2008b). They migrated to Iran and India after 2600BC. The Dravidians carry African haplogroups M1 and y-chromosomes (Winters, 2008b,2010).
What are the 4 races in India? ›The present population of the Indian subcontinent has been divided into four racial groups- the Negritos, the Proto-Australoids, the Proto-Australoids, the Mongoloids, and the Mediterraneans. The Negritos were the first of the racial groups that came to India.
Is Australoid a Caucasoid? ›The Australoids, as previously mentioned, are considered to be archaic Caucasoids.
What are the 3 original races of humans? ›Abstract. Using gene frequency data for 62 protein loci and 23 blood group loci, we studied the genetic relationship of the three major races of man, Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid. Genetic distance data indicate that Caucasoid and Mongoloid are somewhat closer to each other than to Negroid.
Which race is native to India? ›The people of India are predominantly Caucasoid. Their features, hair texture, hairiness, the shape of the nose, mouth, and so on, are all distinctly Caucasoid. It is only in some of the far, out-of-the-way places of India, as in this country, that you find certain traces of other races.
Which race is Caucasoid in world? ›Caucasoid was a word for a person from Europe, West Asia, South Asia, Central Asia, North Africa, or the Horn of Africa. The group of these persons was called "Caucasoid race" or Caucasian race. In former times, many people divided human beings into three races.
What color is Australoid? ›
Huxley (1870) described Australioids as dolichocephalic; their hair as usually silky, black and wavy or curly, with large, heavy jaws and prognathism, with skin the color of chocolate and irises which are dark brown or black.
What are the Caucasoid race features? ›The Caucasoid, found in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East to North India, is characterized by pure white to rich brown skin, thin and high nose, medium lips, medium to tall stature, a long or broad head form. The hair is light blond to dark brown in color, of a fine texture, and straight or wavy.
What race is the oldest in the world? ›A new genomic study has revealed that Aboriginal Australians are the oldest known civilization on Earth, with ancestries stretching back roughly 75,000 years.
What are the 4 original races? ›Another popular division recognizes 4 major races
The world population can be divided into 4 major races, namely white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black, and Australoid. This is based on a racial classification made by Carleton S. Coon in 1962.
- White.
- Black or African American.
- American Indian or Alaska Native.
- Asian.
- Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
Dravidian Nationalism was thus based on three ideologies: dismantling of Brahmin hegemony; revitalization of the Dravidian Languages (that include Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam and Tamil) and social reform by abolition of existing caste systems, religious practices and recasting women's equal position in society.
What are the physical features of Dravidian race? ›The Dravidians are characterized by the dolichocephalic heads, medium stature, brownish black skin colour and the mesorrhine nose. They possess plentiful hair, which are wavy with an occasional tendency to curl. The people of South India speaking Tamil, Malayalam, Telegu, Canarese, etc. belong to this type.
What is the meaning of Dravidians? ›Dra·vid·i·an drə-ˈvi-dē-ən. : a member of an ancient dark-skinned people of southern India. : dravidian languages. Dravidian adjective.
What are the 7 races of people? ›- American Indian or Alaska Native. ...
- Asian. ...
- Black or African American. ...
- Hispanic or Latino. ...
- Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. ...
- White.
OMB requires five minimum categories: White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
What are the genetics of Indians? ›
The extant Indian gene pool is composed of largely four ancestral genetic components, namely Ancestral North Indian (ANI), Ancestral South Indian (ASI), Ancestral Tibeto-Burman (ATB), and Ancestral Austro-Asiatic (AAA) [14,15,16].
What is an example of Australoid race? ›Anthropology. a descriptive category including principally the Australian Aboriginal peoples and sometimes including Papuans, Melanesians, various peoples, as Negritos, of the Philippines, Malay Peninsula, and Andaman Islands, and some of the tribes of central and southern India.
What are the features of Mongoloid race? ›Mongoloid is a term used for all or some peoples indigenous to East Asia, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, North Asia, South Asia, the Arctic, the Americas, the Pacific Islands. Mongoloids are characterized by reddish skin, fairly thick lips, wider nose and straight hair.
What is the largest human race in the world? ›The world's largest nationality group is Chinese, with Mandarin being the world's most spoken language in terms of native speakers.
What race was the first human? ›Evidence still suggests that all modern humans are descended from an African population of Homo sapiens that spread out of Africa about 60,000 years ago but also shows that they interbred quite extensively with local archaic populations as they did so (Neanderthal and Denisovan genes are found in all living non-Africa ...
Did all humans come from Africa? ›Humans first evolved in Africa, and much of human evolution occurred on that continent. The fossils of early humans who lived between 6 and 2 million years ago come entirely from Africa. Most scientists currently recognize some 15 to 20 different species of early humans.
What is the first human race on Earth? ›Overview. Homo sapiens, the first modern humans, evolved from their early hominid predecessors between 200,000 and 300,000 years ago. They developed a capacity for language about 50,000 years ago. The first modern humans began moving outside of Africa starting about 70,000-100,000 years ago.
Which is the oldest race in India? ›The oldest inhabitants of India are considered to be Negritoes. Perhaps they were the first of the racial groups that came to India. They got settled in the hilly areas of Kerala and the Andaman Islands. Kadar, Irula and Puliyan tribes of Kerala resemble to a great extent with the Negritos.
Who are the original natives of India? ›Adivasi is the collective term for the Tribes of the Indian subcontinent, who are considered to be the indigenous people of India. prior to the Dravidians and Indo-Aryans.
Who are considered Caucasian? ›Today, Caucasian lacks any real scientific meaning, but hangs on as a blanket term for white/European people because the U.S. legal system made use of it to shape policy and the nature of its society.
Are Turkish people Caucasian? ›
Most haplogroups in Turkey are shared with its West Asian and Caucasian neighbors. The most common haplogroup in Turkey is J2 (24%), which is widespread among Mediterranean, Caucasian, and West Asian populations.
What is the rarest type of race? ›There are around 1000 Istro-Romanians, an ethnic group from the peninsula of Istria on the Adriatic coast who claim being descendants of the Romance people living during the days of the Roman Republic/Empire.
What does white Caucasian mean? ›Medical Definition
Caucasian. adjective. Cau·ca·sian ˈkȯ-ˈkā-zhən, -ˈkazh-ən. : of or relating to a group of people having European ancestry, classified according to physical traits (as light skin pigmentation), and formerly considered to constitute a race of humans.
Among the Mongoloids, the skin colour ranges between saffron to yellow brown, while some individuals have reddish brown skin colour. The Negroids have brown to brown-black or yellow-brown skin colour.
Is Philippines Mongoloid? ›The early inhabitants of the Philippines were Mongoloid descent which are predominant today.
What is the difference between Negroid and Australoid? ›Where living men are observed, the Negroid has characteristically wooly black hair on his head and sparse body hair, whereas the Australoid has curly, wavy, or straight hair on his head which exhibits various shades of dark brown and, in some groups, abundant body hair.
What was the color of the first humans? ›From about 1.2 million years ago to less than 100,000 years ago, archaic humans, including archaic Homo sapiens, were dark-skinned.
How old is the Caucasian? ›The “Caucasian race” category was a product of the European Enlightenment and late-eighteenth-century natural history. It was introduced about one hundred years after François Bernier's 1684 “New Division of the Earth,” which featured a Europe-centered “white” race.
What races live longer? ›Racial gaps in life expectancy have long been recognized. The same CDC data show that nationally, Hispanic Americans have the longest life expectancy, followed by white and then Black Americans.
Who created the 5 races? ›Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840) divided the human species into five races in 1779, later founded on crania research (description of human skulls), and called them (1793/1795):
How many biological races are there? ›
In a landmark paper based on the Human Genome Project, scientists showed that there are no “races” but a single human race—not in sociological terms, but according to biology. The project found that there is more genetic variation within a single population subgroup than between two different population subgroups.
How many types of races start? ›RaceSplitter supports four race start types — mass, interval, wave and variable.
What are the 5 races of men? ›Races of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Heroes & Iron • Gold: no labour • Silver: children for 100 years • Bronze: violent, self-destructive • Heroes: age of Theban and Trojan wars • Iron: criminal, impious, constant labour = now - and it will get worse….
What are the 11 major human races in the world? ›Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid, Asiatic sub group, Pacific Island and Australian, Amerindians and Eskimos. Europeans, (4) Eastern and Central Europeans, and (5) Mediterraneans. Polynesian race vi) Australian Group - (13) Australian aborigines.
How old is the human race? ›Modern humans originated in Africa within the past 200,000 years and evolved from their most likely recent common ancestor, Homo erectus, which means 'upright man' in Latin. Homo erectus is an extinct species of human that lived between 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago.
Are all Indians Dravidians? ›Hence about 28% of Indians are Dravidians and reside in South India with one of the Dravadian languages as their main language, which includes, Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada and Tulu. The Dravidian language has three subgroups, namely North Dravidian, Central Dravidian and South Dravidian.
Are Dravidian people Hindu? ›The early Dravidian religion constituted a non-Vedic form of Hinduism in that they were either historically or are at present Āgamic. The Agamas are non-Vedic in origin, and have been dated either as post-Vedic texts, or as pre-Vedic compositions.
What is my ethnicity if I was born in India? ›“South Asian” (from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and more); “East Asian” (from China, Japan, Hong Kong, North Korea, South Korea and more); “Southeast Asian” (from Cambodia, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and more).
Were Dravidians the first Indians? ›If it was believed at one time that Dravidians were the original inhabitants of India, that view has since been considerably modified. Now the generally accepted belief is that the pre-Dravidian aborigines, that is, the ancestors of the present tribals or Adivasis (Scheduled Tribes), were the original inhabitants.
Who are the original people of India? ›Adivasi is the collective term for the Tribes of the Indian subcontinent, who are considered to be the indigenous people of India. prior to the Dravidians and Indo-Aryans. It refers to "any of various ethnic groups considered to be the original inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent."
Who are the original Dravidians? ›
The original inhabitants of India were the pre-Dravidian tribals, the adivasis or Scheduled Tribes, like the Bhils, Gonds, Santhals, Todas, etc. They do not speak the Indo-Aryan languages nor the Dravidian languages, but languages similar to the pre-Dravidian Austric group of languages.
What countries speak Dravidian? ›Dravidian languages, family of some 70 languages spoken primarily in South Asia. The Dravidian languages are spoken by more than 215 million people in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.
Where did the people of India come from? ›The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50,000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10,000 and 20,000 years ago, shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.
What is the oldest ethnic group in India? ›The oldest inhabitants of India are considered to be Negritoes. Perhaps they were the first of the racial groups that came to India. They got settled in the hilly areas of Kerala and the Andaman Islands. Kadar, Irula and Puliyan tribes of Kerala resemble to a great extent with the Negritos.
What ethnicity is British Indian? ›The majority of British Indians are of Punjabi, Gujarati, Bengali and Malayali descent, with smaller Tamil, Telugu, Konkani, and Marathi communities. Distribution by local authority in the 2011 census.
Which parent determines the nationality of a child? ›Beginning in 1989, the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) changed their standards for determining a child's race. Since that time, a child's race has been determined by the race of the mother as reported on the birth certificate. The following are NCHS guidelines for determining the child's race.
What is my nationality if my parents are from India? ›A person born in India on or after 3rd December, 2004 is considered citizen of India by birth if both the parents are citizens of India or one of the parents is a citizen of India and the other is not an illegal migrant at the time of his birth.